tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6661503369345934670.post1051587462568309540..comments2023-05-07T10:36:29.851+01:00Comments on Hein de Haas: The only way to reduce immigration is to wreck the economyHein de Haashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04431782094676290011noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6661503369345934670.post-77862813511647252672013-01-18T06:27:05.541+00:002013-01-18T06:27:05.541+00:00Nice Information
Regards
Immigration Attorney P...Nice Information <br /><br /><br />Regards<br /><a href="http://www.habichlaw.com/attorney_profile.html" rel="nofollow">Immigration Attorney Phoenix</a>Freeadshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02073301431091857626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6661503369345934670.post-79511911669111854202012-03-26T22:29:44.581+01:002012-03-26T22:29:44.581+01:00Respect for human rights is indeed one major reaso...Respect for human rights is indeed one major reason why liberal democracies cannot stop immigration. Think for instance about the right on family life. In addition, these countries tend to be wealthy and nonmigrants tend to shun certain jobs migrants pick up. Even non-human rights respecting nations have difficulties controlling immigration. Gulf countries also face increasingly long-term immigration for instanceHein de Haashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04431782094676290011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6661503369345934670.post-87917884663622216342011-11-18T16:03:03.639+00:002011-11-18T16:03:03.639+00:00Eh...well, actually that is kind of not true.
Imm...Eh...well, actually that is kind of not true.<br /><br />Immigration reduction is very effective and only needs a determined nation not constrained (or willing to deconstrain itself) by human right treaties that have drifted off from their original purpose.<br /><br />Proofs:<br />- Japan is rich and has no big immigration.<br />- Operation Wetback (US, 1950s)<br />- America before 1967: no large scale immigration<br /><br />It is a matter of will and political mandate.<br /><br />Not of fate, as mr De Haas would have us believe.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com